Choose Your Learning Plan Today

Learning how to shield software from threats is a bit like strengthening a house—you want the right tools and the right training, but not everyone needs the same blueprint. Some folks are looking for a strong foundation, while others are after advanced skills to tackle more complex problems. And honestly, I've seen people thrive with very different approaches, so finding what fits you—your schedule, your goals, your curiosity—matters more than picking the “most” of anything. We’ve set things up to let you choose what’s comfortable, whether you’re dipping your toes in or planning to wade deeper. Different plans are designed to meet different needs, no pressure—just options that let you learn at your own pace, in your own way. Explore our options below to find your ideal learning path:

• Diamond

  The “Diamond” involvement pathway stands out most for its unusually close, almost hands-on guidance—you get a real sense that someone’s walking alongside you, not just tossing over resources. What often matters most to folks who go this route isn’t the sheer quantity of content (though there’s plenty), but the depth and specificity of the feedback. For instance, there’s a recurring story about someone who finally cracked a persistent authentication flaw because they got tailored analysis on their particular codebase, not just generic examples. And yes, you’ll get priority access to new scenarios, but honestly, it’s that direct, sometimes lengthy back-and-forth with experts that people seem to talk about after. If you’re the type who gets stuck on subtle, context-heavy security issues—and you want to ask “wait, in my stack, what does this mean?”—this might actually fit better than the broader tracks. Just be ready for a bit of a time commitment; it’s not a quick dip-in-and-out arrangement.

  4760 kr

• Premium

  The “Premium” participation format is really built for those who want to dig deeper—people who’ve already got a decent foundation and now crave hands-on, nuanced feedback, not just generic advice. I’ve noticed the ones who get the most out of it are the folks who ask the kind of questions that don’t fit nicely into a FAQ. For them, the direct channel to instructors, especially during the weekly code review sessions (which sometimes run long because the discussion gets so involved), is the real draw—even more than the extra resources or curated exercises. Sure, the access to advanced case studies is valuable too, but honestly, it’s the actual back-and-forth, the space to wrestle with tricky scenarios in real time, that stands out. And—maybe this is just my bias—but having someone remember your last project and connect it to this week’s bug hunt goes a long way for learners who hate feeling like a face in the crowd.

  3140 kr

• Introductory

  The "Introductory" participation format tends to focus on giving people a gentle start—I've seen folks appreciate that you can just dip your toes in without feeling lost in a flood of jargon or pressure to perform. You get these guided walkthroughs—sometimes with surprisingly candid commentary from the instructors—so you’re not just reading theory but actually following along as someone explains where things usually trip people up. There’s a real emphasis on building confidence, not just knowledge, which, frankly, stands out more than the technical content itself at this level. And while you won’t be thrown into deep-end challenges, the pace lets you ask questions that might feel too basic elsewhere—like, “Wait, why does this even matter?”—which is something I’ve heard people say they genuinely value.

  1740 kr

• Plus

  Plus access is really about getting beyond the surface—participants commit a bit more, typically both in time and in willingness to engage with practical exercises, and in return they receive not just extra content but hands-on code review sessions (that’s the piece people tend to remember afterward). There’s a steady flow of real-world scenarios—sometimes a little messy, never just theory. And, well, the group discussions here have a different energy; people are actually sharing mistakes and those “I wish I’d known this earlier” moments, which, in my experience, can be more valuable than a slick lecture. The exchange is pretty clear: you give more of your attention, and in exchange, you gain the sort of feedback that usually only happens when you’re already in the field. Not everyone needs this depth, but for those a little past the basics, it’s a sensible next step.

  2380 kr